Lenovo 20079

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.19% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 20079  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Base Board Product Name
Memory4.2 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120814
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 26 '21 at 17:15
Run Duration108 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2330M-$150
CPU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
52.3% Above average
Memory 82.5
1-Core 51.3
2-Core 98.2
50% 77.3 Pts
4-Core 132
8-Core 122
17% 127 Pts
64-Core 141
9% 141 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Legend(17AA 397A) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
1.19% Terrible
Lighting 1.4
Reflection 3
Parallax 1.9
1% 2.1 fps
MRender 2.1
Gravity 0.6
Splatting 1.9
1% 1.53 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.19%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB-$22
394GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 39 34 36 36 73 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
37.1% Below average
Read 82
Write 81.8
Mixed 47.8
SusWrite 46.9
48% 64.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RMT3010EC58E8F1333 Kingston 9905428-051.A00LF 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
46.7% Average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 16.7
MC Mixed 15.7
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 12.5
35% 12.3 GB/s
Latency 76
53% 76 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20079 Builds (Compare 321 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20079

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $188
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback