Asus P7P55D-E PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 28% Raft	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	36.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	23.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P7P55D-E PRO (all builds)
Memory	6.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20101214
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 06 '17 at 02:35
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 860-$320 51,451 User benchmarks, average bench 64% LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	72.3% Very good	Memory 94.1 1-Core 86.8 2-Core 168 70% 116 Pts	4-Core 277 8-Core 378 41% 328 Pts	64-Core 379 24% 379 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 72.3% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198 440,282 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Asus(1043 8528) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 378.78 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	36.4% Below average	Lighting 47.6 Reflection 45.1 Parallax 43.9 39% 45.5 fps	MRender 39.9 Gravity 41.2 Splatting 36.7 32% 39.3 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 36.4% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 63GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK10D7 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 634 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 187 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (A9) Unknown 100 100 7 (AA) Unknown 100 100 15 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 589851 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 52 (C2) HDA temperature 72 66 146030198812 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (DA) Unknown 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 99 (E9) Unknown 100 100 781 (F1) Unknown 100 100 657 (F2) Unknown 100 100 522 (F4) Unknown 100 100 9 (F5) Unknown 100 100 27 (F6) Unknown 100 100 208384	23.7% Poor	Read 209 Write 66.6 Mixed 75.1 25% 117 MB/s	4K Read 15.2 4K Write 13.2 4K Mixed 3.93 35% 10.8 MB/s	DQ Read 27.7 DQ Write 35 DQ Mixed 2.18 10% 21.6 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 23.7% Great: 85%
WD WD5002ABYS-02B1B0 500GB 8,392 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 464GB free Firmware: 02.03B03 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 201 201 2933 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 189 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 632 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 181 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 47 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 141 (C2) HDA temperature 119 115 28 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 1 28758 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	64.7% Good	Read 114 Write 112 Mixed 105 83% 110 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.14 4K Mixed 0.44 118% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 64.7% Great: 64%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8GB 82,857 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	38.1% Below average	MC Read 15.9 MC Write 10.4 MC Mixed 10.6 35% 12.3 GB/s	SC Read 11.6 SC Write 10.5 SC Mixed 11.4 32% 11.2 GB/s	Latency 59.5 67% 59.5 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 38.1% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P7P55D-E PRO Builds (Compare 350 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P7P55D-E PRO

CPU
Core i7 860Intel $320Bench 64%, 51,451 samples	80x
Core i5 760Intel $100Bench 64%, 34,495 samples	76x
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	75x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	25x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	22x
GTX 760Nvidia $209Bench 26%, 161,132 samples	12x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	12x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	12x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	12x

RAM
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	136x
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	121x
12GBUnknownBench 35%, 85,415 samples	37x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $407

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16