MSI MPG X570 GAMING PRO CARBON WIFI (MS-7B93)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 199%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 202%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics218% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive419% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B93
MotherboardMSI MPG X570 GAMING PRO CARBON WIFI (MS-7B93)  (all builds)
Memory25.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200907
Uptime2 Days
Run DateJan 25 '21 at 21:17
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$180
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
94.4% Outstanding
Memory 75.8
1-Core 166
2-Core 324
100% 189 Pts
4-Core 606
8-Core 995
98% 800 Pts
64-Core 1,557
96% 1,557 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 94.4%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$866
MSI(1462 3882) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 4900 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 461.09
Performing below potential (75th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
218% Outstanding
Lighting 327
Reflection 289
Parallax 327
267% 314 fps
MRender 351
Gravity 261
Splatting 186
209% 266 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 218%
Great: 230%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force MP600 NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$167
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: EGFM11.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3076 3170 3205 3240 3235 3236 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
419% Outstanding
Read 1,970
Write 3,625
Mixed 2,157
SusWrite 3,194
623% 2,736 MB/s
4K Read 47
4K Write 192
4K Mixed 82.4
278% 107 MB/s
DQ Read 1,365
DQ Write 1284
DQ Mixed 1324
994% 1,324 MB/s
Poor: 183%
This bench: 419%
Great: 496%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMT32GX4M4C3600C18 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
63.9% Good
MC Read 24.9
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 25.4
63% 22.1 GB/s
SC Read 25.1
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 26.3
64% 22.4 GB/s
Latency 88.8
45% 88.8 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 135%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MPG X570 GAMING PRO CARBON WIFI (MS-7B93) Builds (Compare 4,572 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 161%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 162%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG X570 GAMING PRO CARBON WIFI (MS-7B93)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $1,172
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback