Samsung Samsung DeskTop System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive38% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSamsung Samsung DeskTop System  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG Samsung DeskTop System
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20080724
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 25 '21 at 04:51
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 53%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E8400-$89
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
32.7% Below average
Memory 57.2
1-Core 34.2
2-Core 51.3
33% 47.6 Pts
4-Core 46.8
8-Core 71.7
7% 59.2 Pts
64-Core 62.1
4% 62.1 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 128GB 128GB
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0413A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 163 157 160 157 148 MB/s
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
38% Below average
Read 184
Write 153
Mixed 162
SusWrite 156
37% 164 MB/s
4K Read 20.4
4K Write 33.2
4K Mixed 11.5
63% 21.7 MB/s
DQ Read 30.3
DQ Write 86.5
DQ Mixed 19.7
26% 45.5 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 38%
Great: 93%
Samsung HD322HJ 320GB-$44
290GB free
Firmware: 1AC01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 111 108 111 110 110 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
59.3% Above average
Read 96.7
Write 83.4
Mixed 51.2
SusWrite 110
62% 85.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
180% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 62%
BMKT MemoRive 1GB
1GB free, PID 1d00
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.1 3.4 3.3 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
2.93% Terrible
Read 9.4
Write 2
Mixed 2.7
SusWrite 3.3
5% 4.35 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
13% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.93%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
17% Very poor
MC Read 4.8
MC Write 6.4
MC Mixed 5.6
16% 5.6 GB/s
SC Read 4.1
SC Write 5.1
SC Mixed 4.4
13% 4.53 GB/s
Latency 136
29% 136 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 17%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Samsung DeskTop System Builds (Compare 1,780 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung Samsung DeskTop System

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback