| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 21.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 14.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
| Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Run History
| System | HP Z620 Workstation (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 158A |
| Memory | 23.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20160601 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 24 '21 at 21:09 |
| Run Duration | 122 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 1% |
PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 0
CPU0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
|
70.4%
Very good
|
66% 112 Pts
|
57% 480 Pts
|
99% 1,598 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
21.1%
Poor
|
22% 30.4 fps
|
20% 25.4 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$34
7GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z32080RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 19 16 26 14 18 MB/s
|
14.2%
Very poor
|
25% 114 MB/s
|
20% 4.87 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate ST1000NM0011 1TB
763GB free
Firmware: SN03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 142 142 144 142 144 MB/s
|
82.3%
Excellent
|
93% 126 MB/s
|
200% 1.4 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M393B1K70QB0-YK0 4x8GB
4 of 12 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
51.1%
Above average
|
55% 19.2 GB/s
|
25% 8.77 GB/s
|
49% 82.1 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Z620 Workstation Builds (Compare 2,427 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: HP Z620 Workstation
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Xeon E5-1620 0Intel $345Bench 70%, 17,464 samples | 152x |
| CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 01stBench 55%, 2,873 samples | 151x |
| CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples | 131x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples | 173x |
| Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples | 113x |
| Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples | 96x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 66% - Good | Total price: $345 |