| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 82.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 72.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
| Motherboard | Asus X99-DELUXE II (all builds) |
| Memory | 24.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | Цвета: 3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20170331 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 05 '17 at 12:51 |
| Run Duration | 247 Seconds |
| Run User | BLR-User |
| Background CPU | 0% |
PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
|
72.5%
Very good
|
64% 106 Pts
|
50% 412 Pts
|
47% 766 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 381.89
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
82.8%
Excellent
|
84% 102 fps
|
81% 98.1 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$625
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B0QBXX7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
|
72.8%
Very good
|
104% 499 MB/s
|
56% 12.7 MB/s
| |
|
WD WD60PURX-64LZMY0 6TB
23GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
47.4%
Average
|
60% 80.3 MB/s
|
109% 1.22 MB/s
| |
|
|
37.9%
Below average
|
58% 76.4 MB/s
|
66% 0.77 MB/s
| |
|
|
58.9%
Above average
|
78% 103 MB/s
|
88% 0.96 MB/s
| |
|
|
67.1%
Good
|
82% 110 MB/s
|
137% 1.1 MB/s
| |
|
|
53.7%
Above average
|
70% 92.7 MB/s
|
119% 1.31 MB/s
| |
|
|
99.8%
Outstanding
|
122% 163 MB/s
|
131% 1.14 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M393A2K40BB1-CRC 2x16GB
2 of 8 slots used
32GB RIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 2176 MHz
|
66.2%
Good
|
70% 24.6 GB/s
|
38% 13.4 GB/s
|
58% 69.1 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical X99-DELUXE II Builds (Compare 853 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus X99-DELUXE II - $452
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-6850KIntel $115Bench 84%, 29,279 samples | 200x |
| Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples | 170x |
| Core i7-6900KIntel $120Bench 86%, 6,755 samples | 102x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1080Nvidia $245Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 177x |
| GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 89x |
| GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 64x |
| SSD |
|
|---|---|
| 850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples | 42x |
| 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $625Bench 223%, 54,978 samples | 40x |
| 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $94Bench 251%, 262,559 samples | 36x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 86% - Excellent | Total price: $902 |