Asus X550VX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics14.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive76% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus X550VX  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X550VX
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160328
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 05 '17 at 11:28
Run Duration620 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
73.2% Very good
Memory 84.6
1-Core 102
2-Core 187
72% 124 Pts
4-Core 357
8-Core 363
48% 360 Pts
64-Core 367
23% 367 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950M
Asus(1043 1130) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 22.21.13.8233
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
14.6% Very poor
Lighting 18.4
Reflection 13.5
Parallax 16
15% 16 fps
MRender 20.6
Gravity 18.5
Splatting 13.3
14% 17.5 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 16%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 750GB-$75
403GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR050 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
76% Very good
Read 480
Write 297
Mixed 325
81% 368 MB/s
4K Read 22.7
4K Write 51.2
4K Mixed 22.7
91% 32.2 MB/s
DQ Read 316
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 48
90% 183 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 76%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43BB0-CPB Kingston KHX2133C13S4/8G 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
71.3% Very good
MC Read 26.1
MC Write 27.9
MC Mixed 22.3
73% 25.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 25.9
SC Mixed 21
59% 20.6 GB/s
Latency 72.5
55% 72.5 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X550VX Builds (Compare 1,497 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X550VX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 32% - Below average Total price: $38
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback