Novatech PC-1945M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 104%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics120% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemNovatech PC-1945M  (all builds)
MotherboardGigabyte Z170XP-SLI-CF
Memory28.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171201
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 24 '21 at 08:38
Run Duration258 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$230
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
84.8% Excellent
Memory 93.2
1-Core 139
2-Core 259
92% 164 Pts
4-Core 413
8-Core 617
64% 515 Pts
64-Core 732
45% 732 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
120% Outstanding
Lighting 162
Reflection 177
Parallax 184
132% 174 fps
MRender 128
Gravity 171
Splatting 120
113% 140 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 120%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
103GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,595
Write 2,111
Mixed 1800
482% 2,169 MB/s
4K Read 73.6
4K Write 185
4K Mixed 100
338% 120 MB/s
DQ Read 1,515
DQ Write 1,107
DQ Mixed 874
772% 1,165 MB/s
Poor: 178% Great: 355%
Samsung 840 120GB
62GB free
Firmware: DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 305 146 146 146 146 146 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 512
Write 361
Mixed 366
SusWrite 172
79% 353 MB/s
4K Read 46.2
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 54.2
198% 70.5 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 178
184% 302 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 108%
Great: 102%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
81GB free
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 421 301 302 302 299 302 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 509
Write 492
Mixed 432
SusWrite 321
99% 439 MB/s
4K Read 48
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 65.1
219% 77.4 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 358
270% 362 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 124%
Great: 124%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
116GB free
Firmware: 2B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1359 300 299 300 301 301 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
235% Outstanding
Read 2,039
Write 1,438
Mixed 700
SusWrite 477
257% 1,163 MB/s
4K Read 50.7
4K Write 180
4K Mixed 58.4
247% 96.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,054
DQ Write 1,192
DQ Mixed 810
696% 1,018 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 235%
Great: 236%
MB4000GCWLV 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: HPG3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 43 42 43 41 43 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
48.2% Average
Read 125
Write 42.5
Mixed 52.2
SusWrite 42.6
48% 65.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.7
128% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 98%
WD My Book 25DA 3TB
553GB free, PID 25da
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 146 146 146 143 147 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
55.8% Above average
Read 117
Write 123
Mixed 102
SusWrite 146
169% 122 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
112% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
79.3% Very good
MC Read 28.2
MC Write 30.3
MC Mixed 24.9
79% 27.8 GB/s
SC Read 19.4
SC Write 31.3
SC Mixed 23.6
71% 24.8 GB/s
Latency 61.7
65% 61.7 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PC-1945M Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship

System: Novatech PC-1945M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $420
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback