HP 15 Notebook PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (87%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 15 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 21BC
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160727
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateJan 24 '21 at 02:44
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User SYC-User
Background CPU 87%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3110M-$70
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
55.2% Above average
Memory 81.9
1-Core 51.6
2-Core 93.8
50% 75.8 Pts
4-Core 168
8-Core 168
22% 168 Pts
64-Core 170
10% 170 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
HP(103C 21BC) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
2.89% Terrible
Lighting 3.5
Reflection 5.7
Parallax 2.5
3% 3.9 fps
MRender 4.2
Gravity 2.1
Splatting 4.3
3% 3.53 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.89%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ACF050 500GB-$150
200GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AV001D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 90 92 110 116 102 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
52% Above average
Read 79.9
Write 83.2
Mixed 40.5
SusWrite 101
56% 76.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 52%
Great: 69%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB
15GB free, PID 1665
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.9 4.9 6.4 5.8 5.6 6.5 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
6.94% Terrible
Read 20.1
Write 13.9
Mixed 11.2
SusWrite 6.2
16% 12.9 MB/s
4K Read 4.8
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.8
62% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 6.94%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ40UG8EFU0-GN-F Samsung M471B5173CB0-YK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
51.8% Above average
MC Read 18.6
MC Write 19.7
MC Mixed 17.4
53% 18.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 12.3
SC Mixed 13.2
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 77.1
52% 77.1 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 15 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 3,239 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP 15 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback