MSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics123% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C37
MotherboardMSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37)  (all builds)
Memory9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201029
Uptime6.8 Days
Run DateJan 23 '21 at 16:57
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$81
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
58.4% Above average
Memory 71.1
1-Core 72
2-Core 125
54% 89.4 Pts
4-Core 246
8-Core 557
46% 401 Pts
64-Core 1,039
64% 1,039 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.09
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
123% Outstanding
Lighting 167
Reflection 150
Parallax 156
136% 158 fps
MRender 181
Gravity 135
Splatting 112
113% 143 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 123%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SUV500M8240G 240GB
70GB free
Firmware: 0030
SusWrite @10s intervals: 255 95 151 130 117 118 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
50.3% Above average
Read 421
Write 388
Mixed 331
SusWrite 145
72% 321 MB/s
4K Read 16.5
4K Write 20
4K Mixed 17.6
58% 18 MB/s
DQ Read 109
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 112
95% 135 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 87%
PNY CS3030 1TB SSD
769GB free
Firmware: CS303226
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1589 993 1008 1017 1017 1008 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
161% Outstanding
Read 969
Write 984
Mixed 703
SusWrite 1,105
212% 941 MB/s
4K Read 18
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 32.6
134% 58 MB/s
DQ Read 75.9
DQ Write 562
DQ Mixed 702
428% 447 MB/s
Poor: 157%
This bench: 161%
Great: 286%
Adata SP 580 120GB
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V3.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 67 55 95 47 68 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 16% Great: 84%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
365GB free
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 132 135 134 128 128 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
76.6% Very good
Read 135
Write 134
Mixed 76.7
SusWrite 132
88% 119 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3600 C18 2x8GB-$65
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
88.8% Excellent
MC Read 36
MC Write 26.7
MC Mixed 35.5
94% 32.7 GB/s
SC Read 19
SC Write 25.1
SC Mixed 31.4
72% 25.2 GB/s
Latency 98.9
40% 98.9 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 122%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37) Builds (Compare 10,563 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37) - $179

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $999
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback