Asus X99-A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive187% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus X99-A  (all builds)
Memory28.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190710
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 23 '21 at 11:58
Run Duration262 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5960X-$285
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
76% Very good
Memory 81.7
1-Core 96.5
2-Core 192
71% 123 Pts
4-Core 379
8-Core 658
63% 518 Pts
64-Core 905
56% 905 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 76%
Great: 94%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SM951 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$69
126GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BXW7300Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1107 1035 1010 987 954 875 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
187% Outstanding
Read 1,422
Write 1,431
Mixed 910
SusWrite 995
267% 1,190 MB/s
4K Read 35.7
4K Write 79.9
4K Mixed 44.9
154% 53.5 MB/s
DQ Read 548
DQ Write 421
DQ Mixed 504
371% 491 MB/s
Poor: 136%
This bench: 187%
Great: 262%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$150
2TB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1782 1798 1798 1783 1592 1311 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
267% Outstanding
Read 1933
Write 1,835
Mixed 1,558
SusWrite 1,678
394% 1,751 MB/s
4K Read 47.7
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 62.1
205% 70.1 MB/s
DQ Read 633
DQ Write 431
DQ Mixed 588
424% 551 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 267%
Great: 435%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$38
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 183 186 185 183 185 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 176
Write 146
Mixed 85.5
SusWrite 184
108% 148 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 103%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB
737GB free
Firmware: CC97
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 96 100 101 103 100 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
55.5% Above average
Read 94.2
Write 81.7
Mixed 33.7
SusWrite 99.5
56% 77.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.2
55% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 74%
WD Elements 25A3 8TB
4.5TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 150 150 152 154 158 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
71.2% Very good
Read 151
Write 161
Mixed 110
SusWrite 153
196% 144 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 1.2
219% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 96%
WD Elements 25A2 1TB
126GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 69 69 67 68 69 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
33.4% Below average
Read 84.5
Write 88.5
Mixed 52.5
SusWrite 68.4
98% 73.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
100% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 33.4%
Great: 63%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 64GB
27GB free, PID a786
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 14 14 14 14 12 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
8.52% Terrible
Read 23.8
Write 11.3
Mixed 7.5
SusWrite 13.3
17% 14 MB/s
4K Read 9.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
34% 3.07 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 8.52%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
108% Outstanding
MC Read 46.1
MC Write 42.1
MC Mixed 40.9
123% 43 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 15.6
SC Mixed 16.6
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 77.5
52% 77.5 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 108%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-A Builds (Compare 1,996 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus X99-A - $240

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $744
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4070 $515Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback