MSI Z170A GAMING M7 (MS-7976)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics94.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive125% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemMSI MS-7976
MotherboardMSI Z170A GAMING M7 (MS-7976)  (all builds)
Memory17 GB free of 20 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180628
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 23 '21 at 08:11
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600K-$113
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
91.9% Outstanding
Memory 84.3
1-Core 146
2-Core 292
94% 174 Pts
4-Core 575
8-Core 562
76% 568 Pts
64-Core 558
35% 558 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 91.9%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
MSI(1462 C307) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.09
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
94.8% Outstanding
Lighting 119
Reflection 130
Parallax 122
97% 124 fps
MRender 94.3
Gravity 125
Splatting 112
91% 110 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 94.8%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
135GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 312 304 269 267 259 260 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
125% Outstanding
Read 509
Write 490
Mixed 463
SusWrite 278
98% 435 MB/s
4K Read 51
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 67.7
230% 81 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 358
270% 362 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 125%
Great: 128%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
223GB free
Firmware: S1Z40102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 410 432 444 449 450 452 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 512
Write 453
Mixed 438
SusWrite 440
104% 460 MB/s
4K Read 37.4
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 26.9
150% 58.5 MB/s
DQ Read 228
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 48.5
101% 202 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 104%
Great: 100%
Seagate NAS HDD 3TB-$119
2.5TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 154 155 155 155 154 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
87% Excellent
Read 150
Write 154
Mixed 64.1
SusWrite 154
95% 130 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
123% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 87%
Great: 99%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$39
450GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 108 108 107 108 108 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
69.2% Good
Read 133
Write 108
Mixed 77.9
SusWrite 108
78% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
202% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 76%
Maxtor STM3250310AS 250GB
165GB free
Firmware: 4.AAA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 90 91 91 91 91 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
51.8% Above average
Read 90.3
Write 49.5
Mixed 46.3
SusWrite 90.1
51% 69.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905665-023.A00G 04CB 20GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 16384 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
72.2% Very good
MC Read 26.3
MC Write 28.6
MC Mixed 21.3
73% 25.4 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 28
SC Mixed 22.4
65% 22.7 GB/s
Latency 72.9
55% 72.9 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170A GAMING M7 (MS-7976) Builds (Compare 2,514 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: MSI Z170A GAMING M7 (MS-7976) - $180

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $770
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback