Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics7.89% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X570 AORUS PRO  (all builds)
Memory29.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200707
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 22 '21 at 23:09
Run Duration199 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$200
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
61.5% Good
Memory 69.4
1-Core 78
2-Core 148
58% 98.5 Pts
4-Core 286
8-Core 748
58% 517 Pts
64-Core 1,439
89% 1,439 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTS 450
Zotac(19DA 1164) 1GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 902 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
7.89% Terrible
Lighting 9.2
Reflection 12.7
Parallax 8.4
8% 10.1 fps
MRender 13.1
Gravity 10.2
Splatting 9.1
9% 10.8 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.89%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS100T2B0B-00YS70 1TB
492GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 415000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 23 19 17 18 16 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 69% Great: 115%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
553GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4,812
Write 5.3
Mixed 9.8
1,150% 1,609 MB/s
4K Read 334
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.4
13,952% 111 MB/s
Poor: 39% Great: 75%
WD Blue 160GB (2007)-$40
92GB free
Firmware: 01.03E01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4,712
Write 4.5
Mixed 8.5
1,125% 1,575 MB/s
4K Read 349
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.6
14,597% 116 MB/s
Poor: 18% Great: 59%
WD Blue SSHD 4TB (2015)-$65
33GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.3 9.5 8.5 11 8.8 9.6 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 37% Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 2x16GB-$85
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
74.5% Very good
MC Read 32
MC Write 20.2
MC Mixed 29
77% 27.1 GB/s
SC Read 18.3
SC Write 20.3
SC Mixed 28
63% 22.2 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 124%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 AORUS PRO Builds (Compare 1,966 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 182%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 181%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $1,152
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback