HP ProLiant DL380 G7

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory92GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 92GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP ProLiant DL380 G7  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory89.1 GB free of 92 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110505
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 22 '21 at 20:09
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5620
Proc 1, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
39.4% Below average
Memory 55.2
1-Core 40.3
2-Core 80.5
37% 58.7 Pts
4-Core 129
8-Core 250
22% 189 Pts
64-Core 500
31% 500 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP LOGICAL VOLUME 300GB
254GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5.14
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 44 48 48 44 44 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
41.8% Average
Read 101
Write 43
Mixed 50.8
SusWrite 44.8
44% 59.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.8
141% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 98%
HP LOGICAL VOLUME 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 5.14
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 73 73 75 76 76 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 18% Great: 87%
HP LOGICAL VOLUME 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: 5.14
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 30 31 31 31 31 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
41.5% Average
Read 114
Write 29.8
Mixed 38.2
SusWrite 30.8
39% 53.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
86% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 92GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 8192, 4096, 8192, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 8192, 4096, 8192, 4096, 8192, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
30.3% Below average
MC Read 12.2
MC Write 9.6
MC Mixed 11.5
32% 11.1 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 7.9
19% 6.73 GB/s
Latency 143
28% 143 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 30.3%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProLiant DL380 G7 Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: HP ProLiant DL380 G7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback