TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Dell Precision T1600

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics49.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive75.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell Precision T1600
MotherboardDell Precision T1600  (all builds)
Memory26.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110528
Uptime8.2 Days
Run DateJan 22 '21 at 16:04
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E31225
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
73.4% Very good
Memory 89.2
1-Core 87.8
2-Core 172
69% 116 Pts
4-Core 336
8-Core 332
45% 334 Pts
64-Core 335
21% 335 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑
This bench: 73.4%
 Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Asus(1043 8641) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49.3% Average
Lighting 71
Reflection 73.2
Parallax 67
58% 70.4 fps
MRender 66.3
Gravity 70.2
Splatting 0.1
33% 45.5 fps
Poor: 51% ↑
This bench: 49.3%
 Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Extreme Pro 240GB-$79
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X21100RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 275 233 194 187 199 177 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
75.3% Very good
Read 472
Write 428
Mixed 262
SusWrite 211
77% 343 MB/s
4K Read 23.9
4K Write 43.8
4K Mixed 26.7
94% 31.5 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 277
DQ Mixed 154
163% 271 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑
This bench: 75.3%
 Great: 114%
Ocz-vertex2 3.5 115GB
13GB free
Firmware: 1.35
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 38 52 41 40 44 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
19.9% Very poor
Read 80.8
Write 61.4
Mixed 85
SusWrite 42.5
15% 67.4 MB/s
4K Read 8.7
4K Write 11
4K Mixed 9.1
31% 9.6 MB/s
DQ Read 138
DQ Write 65.3
DQ Mixed 67.8
59% 90.3 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑
This bench: 19.9%
 Great: 49%
Samsung MZ7LN256HCHP-00000 256GB
116GB free
Firmware: EMT0100Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 225 243 245 239 243 MB/s
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
64% Good
Read 253
Write 240
Mixed 183
SusWrite 227
51% 226 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 49.9
4K Mixed 28.3
101% 34.5 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 194
DQ Mixed 173
137% 190 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑
This bench: 64%
 Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965525-120.A00LF 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
50.7% Above average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 16.2
49% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 16.6
45% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 68.2
59% 68.2 ns
Poor: 46% ↑
This bench: 50.7%
 Great: 67%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Precision T1600 Builds (Compare 566 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell Precision T1600

CPU
Xeon E31225IntelBench 69%, 3,353 samples195x
Xeon E3-1245IntelBench 70%, 3,302 samples161x
Xeon E31270IntelBench 71%, 3,539 samples96x
GPU
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples51x
Quadro 600NvidiaBench 3%, 15,964 samples46x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia  $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples41x
SSD
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples22x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston  $36Bench 54%, 339,020 samples10x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung  $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples10x
RAM
M378B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 11,003 samples9x
M378B5273DH0-CH9 4x4GBSamsungBench 49%, 2,942 samples9x
M378B5273CH0-CH9 4x4GBSamsungBench 49%, 1,553 samples7x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback