Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 32% Sail boat	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.66% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2-$345 10,301 User benchmarks, average bench 71% LGA2011, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	35.1% Below average	Memory 64.3 1-Core 23.4 2-Core 33.5 30% 40.4 Pts	4-Core 36.8 8-Core 38.3 5% 37.5 Pts	64-Core 37.8 2% 37.8 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 35.1% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6450 32,407 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Asus(1043 03DA) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1801.0 Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	1.66% Terrible	Lighting 2.1 Reflection 2.6 Parallax 2 2% 2.23 fps	MRender 1.9 Gravity 1.9 Splatting 1.9 2% 1.9 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.66% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$24 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 434GB free (System drive) Firmware: KC45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 101 114 120 124 124 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	67.8% Good	Read 122 Write 121 Mixed 53.9 SusWrite 114 75% 103 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.8 136% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 67.8% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5471-056.A00LF Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 16GB 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	17% Very poor	MC Read 6.9 MC Write 4 MC Mixed 5.2 15% 5.37 GB/s	SC Read 6 SC Write 4.1 SC Mixed 4.7 14% 4.93 GB/s	Latency 116 35% 116 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 64%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
Quadro K600NvidiaBench 3%, 8,087 samples	1x
Quadro 600NvidiaBench 3%, 15,964 samples	1x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	1x

SSD
TS128GSSD360S 128GBTranscendBench 61%, 775 samples	2x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 3x8GBKingstonBench 52%, 1,140 samples	1x
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBG.SKILLBench 56%, 22,320 samples	1x
4x4GBAdataBench 68%, 1,028 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16