Asus MAXIMUS VII HERO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics62.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive45.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VII HERO  (all builds)
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180418
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 22 '21 at 10:23
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
99.7% Outstanding
Memory 98.2
1-Core 150
2-Core 287
99% 178 Pts
4-Core 548
8-Core 766
83% 657 Pts
64-Core 778
48% 778 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 99.7%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 290X-$549
CLim: 1170 MHz, MLim: 1575 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.12.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
62.3% Good
Lighting 83.2
Reflection 83.8
Parallax 104
68% 90.2 fps
MRender 72
Gravity 73.2
Splatting 49.7
52% 65 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 55%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
3 240GB SSD 240GB
141GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0226A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 301 63 57 40 55 33 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
45.7% Average
Read 472
Write 415
Mixed 38.5
SusWrite 91.3
56% 254 MB/s
4K Read 25.6
4K Write 25.3
4K Mixed 1.9
55% 17.6 MB/s
DQ Read 209
DQ Write 88.2
DQ Mixed 1.6
40% 99.5 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 99%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
359GB free
Firmware: HPH3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 194 197 197 196 196 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 191
Write 72.8
Mixed 77.8
SusWrite 196
98% 134 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 111%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 2520 MHz
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
78.6% Very good
MC Read 23.1
MC Write 33.8
MC Mixed 24.1
77% 27 GB/s
SC Read 18
SC Write 27.4
SC Mixed 24.7
67% 23.4 GB/s
Latency 45
89% 45 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VII HERO Builds (Compare 3,792 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VII HERO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $642
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback