Asrock H77 Pro4/MVP

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics36% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock H77 Pro4/MVP  (all builds)
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120510
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 04 '17 at 06:03
Run Duration89 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3550-$335
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
77.1% Very good
Memory 88.3
1-Core 103
2-Core 202
76% 131 Pts
4-Core 380
8-Core 392
51% 386 Pts
64-Core 376
23% 376 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 670-$435
Gigabyte(1458 3542) 2GB
CLim: 1417 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 382.5
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
36% Below average
Lighting 42.4
Reflection 40
Parallax 50.2
34% 44.2 fps
MRender 55.3
Gravity 49
Splatting 40.7
39% 48.3 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 36%
Great: 31%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Plextor M5 Pro 128GB-$130
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.06 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
48.2% Average
Read 502
Write 309
Mixed 383
88% 398 MB/s
4K Read 19.8
4K Write 2.48
4K Mixed 2.19
34% 8.15 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73EB0-CK0 M378B5273DH0-CK0 M378B5273DH0-CK0 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
36.5% Below average
MC Read 12.5
MC Write 12.3
MC Mixed 10.3
33% 11.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 12.1
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 69.3
58% 69.3 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H77 Pro4/MVP Builds (Compare 500 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock H77 Pro4/MVP - $164

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $761
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback