Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics43.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201014
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 22 '21 at 03:38
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 24%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G-$135
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
62.1% Good
Memory 63.8
1-Core 110
2-Core 190
68% 121 Pts
4-Core 325
8-Core 591
55% 458 Pts
64-Core 590
36% 590 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
PwrHis(1787 D570) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 1850 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.12.1
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
43.7% Average
Lighting 55.9
Reflection 56.2
Parallax 69.7
46% 60.6 fps
MRender 57.6
Gravity 54.7
Splatting 38.9
40% 50.4 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Bulldozer 240GB SSD 240GB
148GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 910XKR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 208 125 126 129 127 132 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
62.3% Good
Read 349
Write 238
Mixed 234
SusWrite 141
54% 241 MB/s
4K Read 27.1
4K Write 58.3
4K Mixed 26.1
105% 37.2 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 232
DQ Mixed 164
128% 171 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 68%
WDC WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GB
58GB free
Firmware: UJ450000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 210 52 27 67 77 89 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
43.5% Average
Read 431
Write 241
Mixed 203
SusWrite 86.9
53% 241 MB/s
4K Read 17.1
4K Write 28.3
4K Mixed 14.9
60% 20.1 MB/s
DQ Read 63.3
DQ Write 58.2
DQ Mixed 40.9
36% 54.1 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 55%
Hitachi HTS547564A9E384 640GB
521GB free
Firmware: JEDOA60B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 16 18 5.9 4.5 31 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
29.9% Poor
Read 87.9
Write 88
Mixed 46.5
SusWrite 16
44% 59.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
112% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 29.9%
Great: 51%
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23
244GB free
Firmware: 01.00A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 75 74 73 75 75 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
45% Average
Read 82.5
Write 81.8
Mixed 58.6
SusWrite 74.4
55% 74.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.5
97% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 45%
Great: 54%
WD WD5000AVDS-63U7B1 500GB
297GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 69 69 68 69 69 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
36% Below average
Read 56.5
Write 51.2
Mixed 35.7
SusWrite 68.7
39% 53 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
97% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 36%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung V-GeN D4S4GL26A16TS6 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
65% Good
MC Read 24.9
MC Write 23.1
MC Mixed 22.1
67% 23.4 GB/s
SC Read 18
SC Write 23.9
SC Mixed 19.7
59% 20.5 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 65%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,069 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $347
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback