Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	80.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	512GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 512GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

PC Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2 827 User benchmarks, average bench 68% CPUSocket, 2 CPU, 20 cores, 20 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	57.4% Above average	Memory 46.2 1-Core 83.9 2-Core 179 55% 103 Pts	4-Core 366 8-Core 738 65% 552 Pts	64-Core 1,805 112% 1,805 Pts
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 57.4% Great: 76%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Dell PERC H310 1.5TB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 788GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.12 SusWrite @10s intervals: 490 484 477 472 469 486 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	80.2% Excellent	Read 598 Write 518 Mixed 357 SusWrite 480 110% 488 MB/s	4K Read 12.9 4K Write 29 4K Mixed 21.2 62% 21 MB/s	DQ Read 129 DQ Write 200 DQ Mixed 237 159% 189 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 80.2% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M386B4G70DM0- 8x31.9GB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 8 of 16 slots used 255GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	40.5% Average	MC Read 22.7 MC Write 10.2 MC Mixed 12.9 44% 15.3 GB/s	SC Read 15 SC Write 5.7 SC Mixed 7.2 27% 9.3 GB/s	Latency 175 23% 175 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 40.5% Great: 133%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 51%

Yacht

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 65%

Battle cruiser

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2697 v21stBench 64%, 772 samples	14x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 01stBench 65%, 4,306 samples	14x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 v21stBench 64%, 1,386 samples	6x

GPU
Quadro P4000NvidiaBench 67%, 12,628 samples	5x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	4x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	4x

SSD
970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $170Bench 322%, 93,447 samples	5x
WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GBWDCBench 93%, 97,462 samples	4x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $100Bench 235%, 154,949 samples	3x

RAM
M393B2G70DB0- M393B2G70DB0- M393B2G70BH0- M393B2G70BH0- M393B2G70DB0- M393B2G70DB0- M393B2G70BH0- M393B2G70BH0- 128GBSamsungBench 96%, 8 samples	3x
F3 DDR3 1600 C11 8x8GBG.SKILLBench 54%, 23 samples	3x
M393B2G70QH0- 8x16GBSamsungBench 96%, 50 samples	3x

Value: 48% - Average

Total price: $170

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16