MSI P67A-C45 (MS-7673)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics17.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive59.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7673
MotherboardMSI P67A-C45 (MS-7673)  (all builds)
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111004
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 21 '21 at 17:51
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
78.4% Very good
Memory 95.2
1-Core 91.5
2-Core 185
73% 124 Pts
4-Core 358
8-Core 355
48% 356 Pts
64-Core 351
22% 351 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 560 Ti-$188
Asus(1043 8390) 1GB
CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 1050 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
17.5% Very poor
Lighting 20.4
Reflection 27.8
Parallax 19.6
17% 22.6 fps
MRender 29.4
Gravity 22.6
Splatting 19.9
19% 24 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata S511 120GB
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.3.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 123 134 140 137 138 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
59.2% Above average
Read 286
Write 147
Mixed 176
SusWrite 133
41% 186 MB/s
4K Read 26.4
4K Write 69.3
4K Mixed 32
118% 42.6 MB/s
DQ Read 34.2
DQ Write 114
DQ Mixed 42.4
42% 63.4 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 81%
WD WD5000AAVS-00ZTB0 500GB
40GB free
Firmware: 05.04C05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 55 58 58 59 59 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
34% Below average
Read 61.2
Write 61.5
Mixed 43.5
SusWrite 56.7
41% 55.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.8
158% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 34%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMX8GX3M2B1600C9 CMX8GX3M2B1600C9 8GB
1867, 1867 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
70% Very good
MC Read 25
MC Write 26.2
MC Mixed 23.1
71% 24.8 GB/s
SC Read 19.5
SC Write 17.5
SC Mixed 19.1
53% 18.7 GB/s
Latency 56.5
71% 56.5 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 70%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P67A-C45 (MS-7673) Builds (Compare 359 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: MSI P67A-C45 (MS-7673)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $474
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback