HP Z420 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics22% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemHP Z420 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1589
Memory6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20131118
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 21 '21 at 16:34
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1650 0-$230
CPU0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
75.6% Very good
Memory 88.8
1-Core 83.9
2-Core 169
68% 114 Pts
4-Core 337
8-Core 539
54% 438 Pts
64-Core 646
40% 646 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K5000
Nvidia(10DE 0965) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 705 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 385.41
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
22% Poor
Lighting 25.5
Reflection 27.4
Parallax 32.6
21% 28.5 fps
MRender 37.1
Gravity 31.1
Splatting 24.2
24% 30.8 fps
Poor: 20%
This bench: 22%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 1 Volume 487GB
247GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 251 252 252 252 252 252 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
92.4% Outstanding
Read 703
Write 257
Mixed 179
SusWrite 252
76% 348 MB/s
4K Read 19.6
4K Write 156
4K Mixed 20.8
139% 65.5 MB/s
DQ Read 193
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 51.3
77% 145 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 92.4%
Great: 127%
Intel Raid 1 Volume 475GB
346GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 42 42 43 45 46 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
19.5% Very poor
Read 24.3
Write 54.7
Mixed 24.5
SusWrite 43.4
27% 36.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.5
83% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 19.5%
Great: 116%
Verbatim Store n Go V3 USB 3.0 16GB-$7
15GB free, PID 0243
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 22 22 22 22 18 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
9.88% Terrible
Read 24.3
Write 19
Mixed 7.8
SusWrite 20.6
23% 17.9 MB/s
4K Read 6.6
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
31% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 9.88%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT325U7EFR8C-RD 4x2GB
4 of 8 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1867 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
80.9% Excellent
MC Read 33.5
MC Write 32.5
MC Mixed 28.4
90% 31.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 11.7
SC Mixed 10.7
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 68.7
58% 68.7 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z420 Workstation Builds (Compare 5,737 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z420 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $373
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback