Dell Precision M6800

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics3.44% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive21.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemDell Precision M6800  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0F5HF3
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20161222
Uptime5.7 Days
Run DateJun 03 '17 at 20:52
Run Duration335 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4800MQ-$150
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 8.6
2-Core 17
6% 12.8 Pts
4-Core 29
8-Core 44.9
5% 37 Pts
64-Core 39.9
2% 39.9 Pts
Poor: 34% Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K4100M
Dell(1028 05CD) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 705 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 353.90
Relative performance (0th percentile)
3.44% Terrible
Lighting 3.83
Reflection 3.46
Parallax 4.5
3% 3.93 fps
MRender 4.76
Gravity 3.63
Splatting 6
4% 4.8 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 3.44%
Great: 17%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SM841N 2.5 7mm 256GB
113GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM03D0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
21.7% Poor
Read 182
Write 146
Mixed 172
37% 167 MB/s
4K Read 6.15
4K Write 4.61
4K Mixed 4.79
18% 5.18 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 21.7%
Great: 108%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 750GB (2010)-$70
361GB free
Firmware: 0005DEM1 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
47.5% Average
Read 89
Write 76.9
Mixed 60.4
56% 75.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.34
4K Write 0.69
4K Mixed 0.21
50% 0.41 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 62%
WD My Passport 0830 1TB
227GB free, PID 0830
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
27.8% Poor
Read 64.1
Write 65.7
Mixed 44.4
73% 58.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.31
4K Mixed 0.22
54% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
18.4% Very poor
MC Read 7.5
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 8.6
22% 7.57 GB/s
SC Read 1.8
SC Write 1.9
SC Mixed 1.9
5% 1.87 GB/s
Latency 593
7% 593 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 18.4%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision M6800 Builds (Compare 1,823 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Precision M6800

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $400
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback