Asus X99-E WS/USB 3.1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus X99-E WS/USB 3.1 (all builds)
Memory	59.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 2 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit 色彩, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit 色彩,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190528
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 21 '21 at 08:30
Run Duration	187 Seconds
Run User	HKG-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5960X-$285 15,468 User benchmarks, average bench 80% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	91.4% Outstanding	Memory 91.8 1-Core 125 2-Core 213 83% 143 Pts	4-Core 488 8-Core 970 86% 729 Pts	64-Core 973 60% 973 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 91.4% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% MSI(1462 3602) CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 2927 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 460.79 Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Lighting 178 Reflection 196 Parallax 222 145% 199 fps	Gravity 181 Splatting 131 135% 156 fps
Poor: 109% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$320 38,669 User benchmarks, average bench 327% 112GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,552 Write 2,445 Mixed 1,437 476% 2,145 MB/s	4K Read 56.8 4K Write 164 4K Mixed 81.1 277% 101 MB/s	DQ Read 1,496 DQ Write 1,199 DQ Mixed 1,333 1,002% 1,343 MB/s
Poor: 215% Great: 425%
Faspeed M3-90G 90GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 27GB free Firmware: 02000002 SusWrite @10s intervals: 255 51 52 47 52 46 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	64.8% Good	Read 375 Write 134 Mixed 264 SusWrite 83.9 47% 214 MB/s	4K Read 29.9 4K Write 92 4K Mixed 21 121% 47.6 MB/s	DQ Read 113 DQ Write 303 DQ Mixed 121 118% 179 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 64.8% Great: 60%
Vi550 S3 SSD 1TB 394 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 150GB free Firmware: SBFM61.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 421 423 433 345 38 53 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	57.1% Above average	Read 213 Write 113 Mixed 105 SusWrite 286 40% 179 MB/s	4K Read 22.1 4K Write 42.5 4K Mixed 26.8 90% 30.5 MB/s	DQ Read 53.9 DQ Write 78.1 DQ Mixed 102 67% 78.1 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 57.1% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C16 4x16GB 1,166 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 4 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2000 MHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	129% Outstanding	MC Read 53.2 MC Write 54.4 MC Mixed 43.9 144% 50.5 GB/s	SC Read 17 SC Write 23.2 SC Mixed 24.6 62% 21.6 GB/s	Latency 64.4 62% 64.4 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 129% Great: 118%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-E WS/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 261 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 102%

UFO

Desktop 83%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 98%

Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus X99-E WS/USB 3.1

CPU
Core i7-5960XIntel $285Bench 80%, 15,468 samples	38x
Core i7-6850KIntel $115Bench 84%, 29,279 samples	28x
Core i7-6900KIntel $120Bench 86%, 6,755 samples	23x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	31x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	27x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	21x

SSD
SSDSC2BB150G7 150GBIntelBench 52%, 328 samples	20x
970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $320Bench 327%, 38,669 samples	11x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	10x

RAM
M393A1K43DB2-CWE 8x8GBSamsungBench 146%, 50 samples	6x
SP008GXLZU320BSA 4x8GBSilicon-PowerBench 99%, 50 samples	6x
M393A2G40DB0-CPB 4x16GBSamsungBench 92%, 1,230 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $770

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16