Gigabyte GA-Z270-HD3-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 40% Speed boat	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 30% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	53.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	83.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Gigabyte Z270-HD3
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z270-HD3-CF (all builds)
Memory	4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161122
Uptime	4.7 Days
Run Date	Jun 03 '17 at 14:55
Run Duration	160 Seconds
Run User	BLR-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium G4560-$31 70,054 User benchmarks, average bench 57% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	71% Very good	Memory 92.7 1-Core 108 2-Core 190 77% 130 Pts	4-Core 287 8-Core 286 38% 286 Pts	64-Core 287 18% 287 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 71% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-Ti-$410 30,815 User benchmarks, average bench 53% MSI(1462 2983) 3GB CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 382.33 Performing below potential (61^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	53.4% Above average	Lighting 66.2 Reflection 64.7 Parallax 88.4 54% 73.1 fps	MRender 77.4 Gravity 72.8 Splatting 48.6 52% 66.3 fps
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 53.4% Great: 59%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 120GB-$35 20,420 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 84GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 4201 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1091 (B1) Unknown 90 90 46 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 63 38 37 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 125 (F1) Unknown 99 99 10876844533	83.5% Excellent	Read 490 Write 275 Mixed 276 76% 347 MB/s	4K Read 41.9 4K Write 64.3 4K Mixed 25.6 130% 43.9 MB/s	DQ Read 312 DQ Write 71.1 DQ Mixed 16.1 57% 133 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 83.5% Great: 110%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 474GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 170 168 2483 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2832 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 91 91 7199 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1758 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 69 43 (BC) Unknown 100 66 188981510197 (BE) vendor-specific 72 44 471138332 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 252 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 2581 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	90.4% Outstanding	Read 157 Write 158 Mixed 150 117% 155 MB/s	4K Read 1.29 4K Write 2.28 4K Mixed 0.26 125% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 90.4% Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 500GB-$80 27,325 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 143GB free Firmware: SD15 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 120 99 240806518 (03) Spinup time 94 88 0 (04) Start/Stop count 91 91 9423 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 1153 (07) Seek error rate 70 60 103329623165 (09) Power-on hours count 62 62 33881 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 62 (0C) Power cycle count 94 37 6603 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 98 55835557925 (BD) vendor-specific 95 95 5 (BE) vendor-specific 71 38 949675687965 (C2) HDA temperature 29 62 51539607581 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 30 19 240806518 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 50	43.7% Average	Read 79.6 Write 72.5 Mixed 81.2 59% 77.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.65 4K Write 1.39 4K Mixed 0.32 89% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 43.7% Great: 59%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33 94,563 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 216GB free Firmware: 01.03B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 156 152 5175 (04) Start/Stop count 93 93 7376 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 61 61 28952 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4125 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 464 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 198 198 7376 (C2) HDA temperature 114 82 33 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 3 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	57.1% Above average	Read 102 Write 97.1 Mixed 96.5 74% 98.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.43 119% 1.14 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 57.1% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2400 C12 2x4GB 1,396 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	43.6% Average	MC Read 15.3 MC Write 14.5 MC Mixed 13 41% 14.3 GB/s	SC Read 13.1 SC Write 14.6 SC Mixed 14 40% 13.9 GB/s	Latency 62.7 64% 62.7 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 43.6% Great: 90%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z270-HD3-CF Builds (Compare 962 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 52%

Yacht

Desktop 90%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 45%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z270-HD3-CF

CPU
Core i7-7700KIntel $230Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	329x
Core i5-7600KIntel $190Bench 76%, 195,006 samples	165x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	133x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	108x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	98x
GTX 1080Nvidia $245Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	93x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	37x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $75Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	36x
MX500 1TBCrucial $66Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	25x

RAM
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	37x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	36x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	19x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 83% - Excellent

Total price: $436

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16