HP p6-2446ef

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP p6-2446ef  (all builds)
MotherboardFoxconn 2ADA
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130205
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 20 '21 at 09:04
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3350P-$60
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
73.3% Very good
Memory 87.9
1-Core 87.2
2-Core 179
69% 118 Pts
4-Core 343
8-Core 327
45% 335 Pts
64-Core 333
21% 333 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 620
Device(1B0A 90BE) 1GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 448 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.73
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
1.96% Terrible
Lighting 2.3
Reflection 3.4
Parallax 0.6
2% 2.1 fps
MRender 3.2
Gravity 2.5
Splatting 2.3
2% 2.67 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.96%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
896GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP33
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 90 116 139 139 144 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
87.3% Excellent
Read 181
Write 189
Mixed 69.9
SusWrite 124
103% 141 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
153% 1 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 87.3%
Great: 112%
EMTEC U3 Smart Drive 2GB
2GB free, PID 1e50
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.6 4.5 4.5 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
4.71% Terrible
Read 13.5
Write 3.3
Mixed 4.8
SusWrite 4.5
7% 6.52 MB/s
4K Read 7.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
28% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.71%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP698650-154-KEB Hynix HMT451U6AFR8A-PB 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
57.1% Above average
MC Read 21.5
MC Write 20.9
MC Mixed 17.5
57% 20 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 17.1
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 69.6
57% 69.6 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical p6-2446ef Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP p6-2446ef

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $60
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback