PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 26.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Micro-Star MS-7B51 |
Motherboard | MSI MPG Z390 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B51) (all builds) |
Memory | 8.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20201231 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Jan 19 '21 at 16:45 |
Run Duration | 128 Seconds |
Run User | ITA-User |
Background CPU | 25% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
84.1%
Excellent
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.09
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
26.3%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 250GB
143GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT24B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 315 295 299 296 295 296 MB/s
|
105%
Outstanding
|
|||
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 105 105 109 108 105 MB/s
|
70.6%
Very good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown BL8G36C16U4R.M8FE1 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
72.7%
Very good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-9700KIntel $242Bench 97%, 550,833 samples | 5,616x |
Core i5-9600KIntel $137Bench 93%, 321,194 samples | 5,291x |
Core i9-9900KIntel $399Bench 98%, 354,223 samples | 2,977x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RTX 2060Nvidia $288Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 1,637x |
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples | 1,552x |
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples | 1,335x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 96% - Outstanding | Total price: $841 |