Samsung 300E4C/300E5C/300E7C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.38% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive21.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (91%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSamsung 300E4C/300E5C/300E7C  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG SAMSUNG_NP1234567890
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130220
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 19 '21 at 05:51
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 91%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3210M-$52
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
53% Above average
Memory 76.9
1-Core 45.2
2-Core 85.8
46% 69.3 Pts
4-Core 167
8-Core 192
23% 179 Pts
64-Core 166
10% 166 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 53%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT620M
Sanyo(144D C652) 1GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 8.17.12.9601
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
5.38% Terrible
Lighting 3.5
Reflection 4.4
Parallax 1.9
3% 3.27 fps
MRender 4.6
Gravity 32.4
Splatting 3.5
10% 13.5 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 5.38%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ezcool S400 120GB
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q111
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 163 32 27 39 5 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
21.1% Poor
Read 207
Write 214
Mixed 5.5
SusWrite 74.6
28% 125 MB/s
4K Read 9.4
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 8.5
26% 6.67 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 21.1%
Great: 90%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB-$23
14GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 71 71 72 70 72 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
43.1% Average
Read 79.5
Write 71.8
Mixed 41.5
SusWrite 70.9
48% 65.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.4
76% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 61%
ADATA USB Flash Drive 16GB
10GB free, PID cb10
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 11 11 11 11 9.6 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
4.83% Terrible
Read 17.5
Write 9.8
Mixed 7.8
SusWrite 10.4
14% 11.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
0% 0.03 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.83%
Great: 11%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M2S4G64CB88B4N-CG 859B CT51264BF160BJ.M8F 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
37.7% Below average
MC Read 13.1
MC Write 14
MC Mixed 13
38% 13.4 GB/s
SC Read 5.6
SC Write 8.9
SC Mixed 11.7
25% 8.73 GB/s
Latency 86.4
46% 86.4 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 300E4C/300E5C/300E7C Builds (Compare 1,057 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 300E4C/300E5C/300E7C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $80
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback