Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics16.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory25.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display3840 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200701
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJan 19 '21 at 02:04
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X-$495
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
85.9% Excellent
Memory 76.1
1-Core 131
2-Core 262
85% 157 Pts
4-Core 512
8-Core 1,023
90% 767 Pts
64-Core 2,610
162% 2,610 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 690 (SLI Disabled)
EVGA(3842 2690) 2GB
CLim: 1382 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 461.09
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
16.7% Very poor
Lighting 7.7
Reflection 51.4
Parallax 38.9
6% 32.7 fps
MRender 55.2
Gravity 43.1
Splatting 39.8
37% 46 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 16.7%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS100T2B0B-00YS70 1TB
322GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 415000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 409 369 380 374 373 363 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 445
Mixed 366
SusWrite 378
95% 422 MB/s
4K Read 36
4K Write 82.8
4K Mixed 46.7
158% 55.2 MB/s
DQ Read 221
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 199
150% 202 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 101%
Great: 115%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
590GB free
Firmware: HP51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 173 176 177 177 177 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
94.7% Outstanding
Read 154
Write 120
Mixed 83.3
SusWrite 176
98% 134 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
170% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 94.7%
Great: 112%
WD VelociRaptor 1TB-$268
926GB free
Firmware: 04.06A00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 193 193 193 194 193 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 197
Write 185
Mixed 117
SusWrite 193
127% 173 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 1.8
366% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 112%
Great: 117%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 3000 C15 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
103% Outstanding
MC Read 41.2
MC Write 36.6
MC Mixed 37.5
110% 38.4 GB/s
SC Read 24.5
SC Write 22.6
SC Mixed 34.9
78% 27.3 GB/s
Latency 88.2
45% 88.2 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 103%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,848 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $192

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $1,037
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback