Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-F2A88XM-D3H

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.23% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A88XM-D3H  (all builds)
Memory11.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140109
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 19 '21 at 00:40
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 57%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-7400K APU (2014 D.Ka)
P0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
44% Average
Memory 73.5
1-Core 64.6
2-Core 59.4
46% 65.8 Pts
4-Core 85.9
8-Core 93.7
12% 89.8 Pts
64-Core 99.5
6% 99.5 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 44%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
AMD(1002 0123) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.11.2
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
2.23% Terrible
Lighting 2.5
Reflection 2.8
Parallax 3.1
2% 2.8 fps
MRender 3
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 3.9
3% 3.1 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.23%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Mb1000hb LMB 1TB
682GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPG0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 15 14 15 15 25 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
30.5% Below average
Read 90.2
Write 17.9
Mixed 43.8
SusWrite 16.2
31% 42 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.4
68% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 30.5%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS4G3D1609DS 1600 CL9 Seri BLS4G3D1609DS 1600 CL9 Seri 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
27.4% Poor
MC Read 9.7
MC Write 7.1
MC Mixed 10.5
26% 9.1 GB/s
SC Read 7.1
SC Write 7.4
SC Mixed 8.6
22% 7.7 GB/s
Latency 93.4
43% 93.4 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A88XM-D3H Builds (Compare 341 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A88XM-D3H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Above average Total price: $160
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $270WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback