Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 35% Sail boat	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	0.48% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	5GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 5GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon II X4 640-$70 18,839 User benchmarks, average bench 45% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	42.5% Average	Memory 54.6 1-Core 44 2-Core 88.8 38% 62.5 Pts	4-Core 177 8-Core 175 24% 176 Pts	64-Core 178 11% 178 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 42.5% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4200 10,090 User benchmarks, average bench 1% HP(103C 2AB1) 256MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.862.3.0 Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	0.48% Terrible	Lighting 0.5 Reflection 0.9 Parallax 0.5 0% 0.63 fps	MRender 0.9 Gravity 0.2 Splatting 1.1 1% 0.73 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.48% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hitachi HDS721075CLA332 750GB-$190 3,719 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 622GB free (System drive) Firmware: JP3O SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 88 115 115 121 129 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	49.1% Average	Read 60 Write 79.9 Mixed 42.5 SusWrite 111 54% 73.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.9 133% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 49.1% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B2873FH0-CH9 M378B5773CH0-CH9 M378B5773CH0-CH9 5GB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 1024, 2048, 2048 MB Performing below potential (33^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	27.3% Poor	MC Read 11 MC Write 6.6 MC Mixed 11 27% 9.53 GB/s	SC Read 7.5 SC Write 6.7 SC Mixed 9.3 22% 7.83 GB/s	Latency 144 28% 144 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 27.3% Great: 46%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

CPU
Athlon II X4 640AMD $70Bench 45%, 18,839 samples	4x

GPU
Radeon HD 4200ATIBench 1%, 10,090 samples	2x
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples	1x
GeForce 310NvidiaBench 1%, 4,147 samples	1x

RAM
M378B5773CH0-CH9 4x2GBSamsungBench 45%, 1,752 samples	1x
HMT451U6AFR8C-PB 4x4GBHynixBench 56%, 3,905 samples	1x
CT51264BA160B.C16F CT51264BA160B.C16F CT51264BA160B.C16F CT51264BA160B.C16F 16GBUnknownBench 37%, 54 samples	1x

Value: 65% - Good

Total price: $70