Dell Precision M4800

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.7% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive70.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDell Precision M4800  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0T3YTY
Memory24.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190613
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 18 '21 at 21:10
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4810MQ-$400
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
72.2% Very good
Memory 77.4
1-Core 105
2-Core 176
70% 119 Pts
4-Core 362
8-Core 556
57% 459 Pts
64-Core 551
34% 551 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Dell(1028 05CC) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.7% Terrible
Lighting 4.1
Reflection 7.9
Parallax 7.3
3% 6.43 fps
MRender 8
Gravity 2.7
Splatting 5.5
4% 5.4 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.7%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Msata-512gb SSD 512GB
212GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0918A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 315 357 384 316 17 88 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
70.6% Very good
Read 458
Write 344
Mixed 366
SusWrite 246
79% 354 MB/s
4K Read 25.5
4K Write 55.4
4K Mixed 22.4
97% 34.4 MB/s
DQ Read 104
DQ Write 260
DQ Mixed 0.4
52% 121 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 71%
Seagate Laptop Thin SSHD 2.5" 500GB-$30
202GB free
Firmware: DEM9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 80 81 81 80 81 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
53% Above average
Read 102
Write 100
Mixed 60.2
SusWrite 80.8
63% 85.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 5.4
4K Mixed 1.8
358% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 53%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
53.3% Above average
MC Read 20.2
MC Write 19.8
MC Mixed 15.3
53% 18.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 19.7
SC Mixed 18.2
50% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 85.6
47% 85.6 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 66%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision M4800 Builds (Compare 2,510 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Precision M4800

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $400
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback