Asus Q87M-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics46.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Q87M-E  (all builds)
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190322
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 18 '21 at 11:20
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4570S
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
73.3% Very good
Memory 82.8
1-Core 103
2-Core 188
72% 125 Pts
4-Core 373
8-Core 350
49% 362 Pts
64-Core 356
22% 356 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 290-$399
AMD(1002 0B00) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 947 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.12.1
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
46.4% Average
Lighting 60.3
Reflection 68
Parallax 80.4
49% 69.6 fps
MRender 58.4
Gravity 54.8
Splatting 41.5
41% 51.6 fps
Poor: 41%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 50%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Rambaite C500 256GB
143GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0703A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 220 98 58 60 59 61 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
64.9% Good
Read 475
Write 406
Mixed 361
SusWrite 92.7
74% 334 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 88.4
4K Mixed 23.8
117% 46.2 MB/s
DQ Read 148
DQ Write 88.2
DQ Mixed 1.8
33% 79.3 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2016)-$112
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 144 144 145 144 144 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
95.1% Outstanding
Read 188
Write 148
Mixed 67.3
SusWrite 143
100% 137 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
136% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 95.1%
Great: 105%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB
2TB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 135 136 136 138 134 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
69.9% Good
Read 106
Write 126
Mixed 81.1
SusWrite 136
82% 112 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 0.6
289% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 92%
USB DISK 2.0 8GB
1GB free, PID 4300
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.9 4.7 6.4 6.6 7.1 7.1 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
4.12% Terrible
Read 11.4
Write 3.7
Mixed 2.2
SusWrite 5.9
7% 5.8 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
18% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.12%
Great: 7%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 8GB
7GB free, PID 1665
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4 4.1 3.5 3.4 3.3 3.3 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
5.43% Terrible
Read 23.4
Write 3.2
Mixed 8.4
SusWrite 3.6
10% 9.65 MB/s
4K Read 5.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
23% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.43%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905471-006.A01LF 99U5471-012.A00LF 9905471-006.A00LF 99U5471-020.A00LF 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
52.9% Above average
MC Read 18.7
MC Write 19.3
MC Mixed 16.4
52% 18.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 17.5
48% 17 GB/s
Latency 75.5
53% 75.5 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Q87M-E Builds (Compare 1,229 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus Q87M-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $388
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback