Compaq-presario WC774AA-UUW CQ5350SC

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 33% Sail boat	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.05% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	27.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Compaq-presario WC774AA-UUW CQ5350SC (all builds)
Motherboard	FOXCONN ETON
Memory	5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20091127
Uptime	3 Days
Run Date	Jan 18 '21 at 10:43
Run Duration	120 Seconds
Run User	FIN-User
Background CPU	32%

PC Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium E5300-$59 18,604 User benchmarks, average bench 36% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	34.1% Below average	Memory 56.1 1-Core 23.8 2-Core 63.9 31% 47.9 Pts	4-Core 72.8 8-Core 72.8 10% 72.8 Pts	64-Core 73.5 4% 73.5 Pts
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 34.1% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce G210 3,988 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Device(1B0A 9045) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 341.92 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.05% Terrible	Lighting 1.3 Reflection 0.5 Parallax 0.3 1% 0.7 fps	MRender 0.9 Gravity 0.7 Splatting 1.9 1% 1.17 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.05% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PNY CS900 120GB-$25 42,924 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 31GB free (System drive) Firmware: CS900612 SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 49 44 44 29 23 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	27.1% Poor	Read 171 Write 117 Mixed 109 SusWrite 48.4 25% 111 MB/s	4K Read 17.5 4K Write 22.2 4K Mixed 12.7 54% 17.5 MB/s	DQ Read 14.9 DQ Write 23.6 DQ Mixed 16.4 13% 18.3 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 27.1% Great: 87%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Nanya NT4GC64B8HG0NF-CG 2x4GB 2,338 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 800 MHz Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	14.9% Very poor	MC Read 5.8 MC Write 4.1 MC Mixed 4.2 13% 4.7 GB/s	SC Read 5 SC Write 3.9 SC Mixed 4.7 13% 4.53 GB/s	Latency 140 29% 140 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 14.9% Great: 53%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical WC774AA-UUW CQ5350SC Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

System: Compaq-presario WC774AA-UUW CQ5350SC

CPU
Pentium E5300Intel $59Bench 36%, 18,604 samples	1x
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce G210NvidiaBench 1%, 3,988 samples	1x
Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples	1x

RAM
EBJ21UE8BDF0-DJ-F 2x2GBElpidaBench 33%, 1,255 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 55% - Above average

Total price: $59

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Compaq-presario WC774AA-UUW CQ5350SC

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

System: Compaq-presario WC774AA-UUW CQ5350SC

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)