HP Z800 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics20.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive59.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP Z800 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0AECh
Memory29 GB free of 32.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180305
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 18 '21 at 00:28
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5687
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
71.7% Very good
Memory 73.5
1-Core 94.2
2-Core 189
67% 119 Pts
4-Core 375
8-Core 744
66% 559 Pts
64-Core 936
58% 936 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
EVGA(3842 2662) 2GB
CLim: 1280 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
20.7% Poor
Lighting 23.3
Reflection 27.3
Parallax 32.5
19% 27.7 fps
MRender 33.6
Gravity 29.8
Splatting 26.5
24% 30 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 20.7%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SKC600256G 256GB
143GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S4500105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 220 245 246 246 246 246 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
59.3% Above average
Read 258
Write 245
Mixed 235
SusWrite 241
55% 245 MB/s
4K Read 22.1
4K Write 52.2
4K Mixed 27.5
96% 33.9 MB/s
DQ Read 111
DQ Write 84.9
DQ Mixed 91
70% 95.7 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 128%
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$100
931GB free
Firmware: SVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 286 318 318 318 318 318 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
73.8% Very good
Read 368
Write 316
Mixed 321
SusWrite 312
74% 329 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 40.8
4K Mixed 30.3
98% 31.9 MB/s
DQ Read 230
DQ Write 194
DQ Mixed 209
157% 211 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 128%
Lsilogic Logical Volume 450GB
81GB free
Firmware: 3000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 60 60 61 61 61 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
61.6% Good
Read 155
Write 68
Mixed 73.8
SusWrite 59.8
66% 89.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 1.1
206% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 79%
Generic USB Flash Disk 1GB
0GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.6 3.6 3.3 3.4 3.3 3.3 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
2.13% Terrible
Read 5
Write 3.2
Mixed 3.3
SusWrite 3.4
5% 3.72 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
10% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.13%
Great: 4%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 2C 36KSF1G72PZ-1G4M1 ID:80 2C 36KSF1G72PZ-1G4M1 ID:80 2C 36KSF1G72PZ-1G4M1 ID:80 2C 36KSF1G72PZ-1G4M1 66GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 34816 MB
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
55.3% Above average
MC Read 25.3
MC Write 15.9
MC Mixed 23.3
61% 21.5 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 7.8
22% 7.83 GB/s
Latency 93.6
43% 93.6 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z800 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,955 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z800 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback