HP Laptop 15-db0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics2.87% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive82.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Laptop 15-db0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 84AC
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200716
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 17 '21 at 23:28
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-9225 RADEON R4, 5 COMPUTE CORES 2C+3G
Socket FP4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
26.4% Poor
Memory 41.1
1-Core 55.9
2-Core 69.2
34% 55.4 Pts
4-Core 69
8-Core 68.9
9% 68.9 Pts
64-Core 86.7
5% 86.7 Pts
Poor: 13%
This bench: 26.4%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R4 Graphics
HP(103C 84AC) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 19.40.50
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
2.87% Terrible
Lighting 3.2
Reflection 4.8
Parallax 4.6
3% 4.2 fps
MRender 3.3
Gravity 3.5
Splatting 5.1
3% 3.97 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.87%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$104
876GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 260 273 327 343 356 357 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
82.5% Excellent
Read 379
Write 356
Mixed 340
SusWrite 319
79% 349 MB/s
4K Read 28.3
4K Write 59.8
4K Mixed 40.3
126% 42.8 MB/s
DQ Read 217
DQ Write 146
DQ Mixed 161
126% 175 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 128%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:0xCD04 F4-2133C15-8GRS 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
23.7% Poor
MC Read 9.2
MC Write 7.6
MC Mixed 8.3
24% 8.37 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 7.5
20% 6.93 GB/s
Latency 197
20% 197 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 23.7%
Great: 25%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Laptop 15-db0xxx Builds (Compare 1,041 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 15-db0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback