PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 27.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 68.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Asus ESC700 G3 (all builds) |
Motherboard | ASUSTeK X99-WS-SYS |
Memory | 24.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz |
Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit kolorów |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20150722 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Jan 17 '21 at 13:33 |
Run Duration | 166 Seconds |
Run User | POL-User |
Background CPU | 100% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
|
56.5%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia Quadro M4000
Nvidia(10DE 1153) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 772 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 431.02
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
27.3%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$190
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 211 168 154 138 134 122 MB/s
|
68.2%
Good
|
|||
Kingston SKC6001024G 1TB
939GB free
Firmware: S4500104
SusWrite @10s intervals: 315 328 396 418 418 421 MB/s
|
89.3%
Excellent
|
|||
Intel Raid 1 Volume 2TB
278GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 122 122 125 125 125 MB/s
|
80.8%
Excellent
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM 1866 MHz clocked @ 1867 MHz
|
91.7%
Outstanding
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples | 2x |
GeForce GTX 560 SENvidiaBench 11%, 1,809 samples | 1x |
Quadro M5000NvidiaBench 50%, 1,540 samples | 1x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 10% - Terrible | Total price: $519 |