MSI MAG X570 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7C84)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics11.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive293% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C84
MotherboardMSI MAG X570 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7C84)  (all builds)
Memory9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201029
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateJan 17 '21 at 10:16
Run Duration254 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$86
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
81.7% Excellent
Memory 83.8
1-Core 140
2-Core 221
85% 148 Pts
4-Core 427
8-Core 802
73% 614 Pts
64-Core 1051
65% 1051 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K620-$170
Nvidia(10DE 1098) 2GB
CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 461.09
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
11.1% Very poor
Lighting 13.8
Reflection 15.8
Parallax 11.1
11% 13.6 fps
MRender 10.9
Gravity 13.6
Splatting 14.7
11% 13.1 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 11.1%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte GP-AG4500G 500GB
397GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EGFM13.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2268 2344 1512 491 486 492 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
293% Outstanding
Read 2,118
Write 2,294
Mixed 1,838
SusWrite 1,266
423% 1,879 MB/s
4K Read 43.8
4K Write 175
4K Mixed 77.1
258% 98.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,320
DQ Write 964
DQ Mixed 1,139
852% 1141 MB/s
Poor: 170%
This bench: 293%
Great: 370%
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$105
840GB free
Firmware: SVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 407 411 415 410 412 412 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 467
Write 418
Mixed 412
SusWrite 411
96% 427 MB/s
4K Read 34.6
4K Write 81.8
4K Mixed 49.2
159% 55.2 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 200
150% 201 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 103%
Great: 128%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$45
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 183 192 202 200 203 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 176
Write 148
Mixed 68.6
SusWrite 193
107% 146 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
153% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 106%
Great: 106%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72
237GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 68 70 69 71 70 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
36.1% Below average
Read 56.1
Write 63.5
Mixed 37.3
SusWrite 69.4
42% 56.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
121% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 57%
RSH ASM1153E 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 167 167 166 168 165 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
95.7% Outstanding
Read 166
Write 163
Mixed 83.4
SusWrite 166
106% 145 MB/s
4K Read 2.6
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 0.9
269% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 95.7%
Great: 95%
ST950032 5AS 500GB
39GB free, PID 70f5
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 40 40 40 40 40 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
16.5% Very poor
Read 38.3
Write 35.4
Mixed 25.9
SusWrite 39.9
47% 34.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.5
42% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 16.5%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$40
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
87.7% Excellent
MC Read 35.3
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 34.9
90% 31.4 GB/s
SC Read 24.4
SC Write 23.8
SC Mixed 33
77% 27.1 GB/s
Latency 73.8
54% 73.8 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAG X570 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7C84) Builds (Compare 7,463 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 182%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 181%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG X570 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7C84) - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $1,386
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback