HP Z800 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics28.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive61.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Z800 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0AECh
Memory60.5 GB free of 0.00195313 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180305
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 17 '21 at 04:38
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5675
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
68.4% Good
Memory 75.7
1-Core 78.5
2-Core 167
62% 107 Pts
4-Core 330
8-Core 503
52% 416 Pts
64-Core 1,193
74% 1,193 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950-$100
CLim: 1519 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
28.6% Poor
Lighting 36.1
Reflection 40.3
Parallax 32.6
29% 36.3 fps
MRender 35.3
Gravity 34.3
Splatting 30.8
27% 33.5 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
RPFTJ128PDD2EWX 128GB
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11.9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 279 167 122 121 120 122 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
61.8% Good
Read 494
Write 155
Mixed 202
SusWrite 155
55% 252 MB/s
4K Read 8.7
4K Write 48.2
4K Mixed 23.5
69% 26.8 MB/s
DQ Read 202
DQ Write 278
DQ Mixed 187
156% 222 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 99%
Imation ImationFlashDriv 4GB
4GB free, PID 067d
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.8 4.1 4.1 4.4 4.4 4.3 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
4.24% Terrible
Read 16.7
Write 9.3
Mixed 6.2
SusWrite 4
11% 9.05 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
15% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.24%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 CE M393B4G70AM0-YF8 ID:80 CE M393B4G70AM0-YF8 98GB
1066, 1066 MHz
32768, 32768, 34816 MB
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
19.6% Very poor
MC Read 6.5
MC Write 5.4
MC Mixed 5.5
17% 5.8 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 6.6
19% 6.6 GB/s
Latency 88.9
45% 88.9 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 19.6%
Great: 21%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z800 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,952 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z800 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback