Asus PRIME H310M-R R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics8.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive10.9% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME H310M-R R2.0  (all builds)
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201208
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateJan 16 '21 at 17:46
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
93.8% Outstanding
Memory 93.3
1-Core 130
2-Core 257
90% 160 Pts
4-Core 508
8-Core 736
78% 622 Pts
64-Core 730
45% 730 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 93.8%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112
Gigabyte(1458 3553) 1GB
CLim: 1110 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 461.09
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
8.7% Terrible
Lighting 9.7
Reflection 12.9
Parallax 12.2
8% 11.6 fps
MRender 14.3
Gravity 12.5
Splatting 11.3
10% 12.7 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.7%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apacer AS350 128GB
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AP613PE0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 78 71 87 85 72 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
10.9% Very poor
Read 26.5
Write 193
Mixed 16.2
SusWrite 92.2
19% 82 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 7.9
4K Mixed 6.1
12% 4.7 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 10.9%
Great: 92%
Seagate ST3320418AS 320GB-$54
165GB free
Firmware: CC35
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 93 91 92 92 93 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
52.7% Above average
Read 92.2
Write 94.5
Mixed 61.9
SusWrite 91.4
63% 85 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
172% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Patriot PSD44G266681 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
87.9% Excellent
MC Read 35
MC Write 34.5
MC Mixed 24.6
90% 31.4 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 33.2
SC Mixed 26.7
74% 25.9 GB/s
Latency 61.5
65% 61.5 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME H310M-R R2.0 Builds (Compare 4,247 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H310M-R R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $268
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback