HP Compaq 8200 Elite USDT PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics0.86% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP Compaq 8200 Elite USDT PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1496
Memory6.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190412
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 16 '21 at 11:37
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400S-$70
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
62.6% Good
Memory 79.1
1-Core 83.1
2-Core 158
63% 107 Pts
4-Core 267
8-Core 274
36% 270 Pts
64-Core 269
17% 269 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
HP(103C 1496) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.86% Terrible
Lighting 0.9
Reflection 1.2
Parallax 1.1
1% 1.07 fps
MRender 1.7
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 1.8
1% 1.3 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.86%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD0128S00 128GB
91GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0722A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 360 349 277 333 346 342 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
45.7% Average
Read 50.1
Write 334
Mixed 111
SusWrite 335
48% 207 MB/s
4K Read 10.9
4K Write 50.8
4K Mixed 8.9
55% 23.5 MB/s
DQ Read 16.5
DQ Write 311
DQ Mixed 13.3
55% 114 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-SD3-1333 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
27.5% Poor
MC Read 8.9
MC Write 9.1
MC Mixed 8
25% 8.67 GB/s
SC Read 8.7
SC Write 9.5
SC Mixed 8.9
26% 9.03 GB/s
Latency 82.3
49% 82.3 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 27.5%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 8200 Elite USDT PC Builds (Compare 278 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8200 Elite USDT PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $98
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback