HP EliteBook 8570w

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.75% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive46.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemHP EliteBook 8570w  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 176B
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150407
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateJan 16 '21 at 09:35
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3740QM-$220
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
75.7% Very good
Memory 81.9
1-Core 98.4
2-Core 199
72% 126 Pts
4-Core 386
8-Core 479
56% 432 Pts
64-Core 477
30% 477 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K2000M
HP(103C 176B) 2GB
CLim: 745 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 385.73
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
5.75% Terrible
Lighting 6.6
Reflection 7.5
Parallax 8.1
5% 7.4 fps
MRender 7.9
Gravity 8.7
Splatting 7.3
6% 7.97 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.75%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 480GB-$250
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 603ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 215 198 106 57 83 49 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
46.3% Average
Read 414
Write 204
Mixed 190
SusWrite 118
51% 232 MB/s
4K Read 16.8
4K Write 13.5
4K Mixed 15.1
52% 15.1 MB/s
DQ Read 208
DQ Write 81.3
DQ Mixed 96.9
84% 129 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 65%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
931GB free, PID 0802
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 136 139 139 139 135 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
50.9% Above average
Read 130
Write 124
Mixed 21
SusWrite 137
135% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.4
39% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73BH0-CK0 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
30.9% Below average
MC Read 10.8
MC Write 9.6
MC Mixed 8.8
28% 9.73 GB/s
SC Read 10.4
SC Write 11.3
SC Mixed 10.3
30% 10.7 GB/s
Latency 77.1
52% 77.1 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 8570w Builds (Compare 902 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 8570w

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $100
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback