Asus PRIME B250M-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics76.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive592% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus PRIME B250M-A  (all builds)
Memory8.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit 色彩, 2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161108
Uptime4.9 Days
Run DateJan 16 '21 at 07:18
Run Duration285 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU 23%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$167
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
76.3% Very good
Memory 83.8
1-Core 101
2-Core 192
73% 126 Pts
4-Core 371
8-Core 570
58% 471 Pts
64-Core 568
35% 568 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
Asus(1043 859F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
76.9% Very good
Lighting 94.6
Reflection 107
Parallax 106
77% 103 fps
MRender 92.2
Gravity 94.3
Splatting 93.8
77% 93.4 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$125
147GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PSF100C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 494 186 29 96 194 158 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
592% Outstanding
Read 5,934
Write 552
Mixed 1,041
SusWrite 193
411% 1,930 MB/s
4K Read 506
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 168
1,040% 261 MB/s
DQ Read 1,377
DQ Write 513
DQ Mixed 916
685% 935 MB/s
Poor: 95%
This bench: 592%
Great: 144%
Crucial MX200 500GB-$90
12GB free
Firmware: MU02
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 5,864
Write 294
Mixed 491
465% 2,216 MB/s
4K Read 536
4K Write 53.4
4K Mixed 52
908% 214 MB/s
DQ Read 1389
DQ Write 69.7
DQ Mixed 442
394% 634 MB/s
Poor: 56% Great: 105%
ST5000AS0011-1L5178 5TB
102GB free
Firmware: CC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 85 88 88 88 83 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
9.12% Terrible
Read 49
Write 72.5
Mixed 58.4
SusWrite 86
15% 66.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 9.5
4K Mixed 0.6
6% 3.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1.1
DQ Write 3.5
DQ Mixed 1.8
2% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.12%
Great: 17%
Kxg50pnv2t04 TOSHIBA 2TB
312GB free
Firmware: AFGA4104
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 90 122 165 210 245 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
597% Outstanding
Read 6,068
Write 109
Mixed 208
SusWrite 154
341% 1,635 MB/s
4K Read 592
4K Write 64.5
4K Mixed 127
1,094% 261 MB/s
DQ Read 1,540
DQ Write 109
DQ Mixed 217
311% 622 MB/s
Poor: 132%
This bench: 597%
Great: 202%
Intel SSDPE2KX020T8 2TB
116GB free
Firmware: VDV10131
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1637 1652 1760 1742 1725 1725 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
715% Outstanding
Read 5,788
Write 1,607
Mixed 2,639
SusWrite 1,707
645% 2,935 MB/s
4K Read 538
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 188
1,122% 283 MB/s
DQ Read 1,578
DQ Write 836
DQ Mixed 1,059
826% 1,157 MB/s
Poor: 205%
This bench: 715%
Great: 299%
Toshiba MD04ACA500 5TB-$154
368GB free
Firmware: FP2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 157 156 159 159 154 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
95.7% Outstanding
Read 176
Write 175
Mixed 62
SusWrite 157
104% 142 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.2
324% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 95.7%
Great: 110%
Hitachi HUH721010ALE600 10TB
46GB free
Firmware: LHGAT21D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 329 334 360 340 329 327 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 69% Great: 135%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
75.9% Very good
MC Read 26.7
MC Write 29.8
MC Mixed 25.6
78% 27.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 29.1
SC Mixed 21.1
61% 21.4 GB/s
Latency 73.8
54% 73.8 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 140%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME B250M-A Builds (Compare 4,588 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus PRIME B250M-A - $74

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $288
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback