Asus TUF B450M-PRO GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics53.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF B450M-PRO GAMING  (all builds)
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191113
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateJan 16 '21 at 00:38
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User HRV-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$145
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.85 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
72.8% Very good
Memory 82.2
1-Core 109
2-Core 205
75% 132 Pts
4-Core 341
8-Core 682
60% 511 Pts
64-Core 930
58% 930 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1411 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.12.1
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
53.8% Above average
Lighting 69.1
Reflection 64.6
Parallax 91.3
56% 75 fps
MRender 62.4
Gravity 72.4
Splatting 48.6
49% 61.1 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WDC WDS250G1B0C- 250GB
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 201000WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,181
Write 1,153
Mixed 986
247% 1,107 MB/s
4K Read 42
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 60
202% 72.7 MB/s
DQ Read 854
DQ Write 703
DQ Mixed 726
558% 761 MB/s
Poor: 112% Great: 191%
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
29GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 354 144 144 135 67 67 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
97.4% Outstanding
Read 492
Write 478
Mixed 392
SusWrite 152
85% 378 MB/s
4K Read 39.4
4K Write 88.1
4K Mixed 47.7
168% 58.4 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 364
DQ Mixed 175
186% 307 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 97.4%
Great: 108%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64
33GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 68 70 69 69 69 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
53.4% Above average
Read 116
Write 97.7
Mixed 74.8
SusWrite 68.9
66% 89.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.9
183% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 85%
WD Black 500GB (2008)-$95
135GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 52 53 53 52 51 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
31.8% Below average
Read 58.2
Write 59.1
Mixed 51.9
SusWrite 52
41% 55.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
156% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$39
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
97.9% Outstanding
MC Read 40.2
MC Write 32.7
MC Mixed 34.5
102% 35.8 GB/s
SC Read 25.5
SC Write 32.3
SC Mixed 26.2
80% 28 GB/s
Latency 76.5
52% 76.5 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 97.9%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B450M-PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 1,935 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450M-PRO GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $358
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback