Asus P6X58D-E

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics9.36% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P6X58D-E  (all builds)
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110324
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 15 '21 at 16:52
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 965-$1,244
LGA1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
71.2% Very good
Memory 92.3
1-Core 78.2
2-Core 157
66% 109 Pts
4-Core 272
8-Core 411
42% 342 Pts
64-Core 414
26% 414 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 5770
Sapphire(174B 1482) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
9.36% Terrible
Lighting 11.9
Reflection 13.1
Parallax 8.5
10% 11.2 fps
MRender 11.2
Gravity 11.6
Splatting 9.5
9% 10.8 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 9.36%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD800JD-75MSA3 80GB-$105
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 10.01E03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 12 6.3 5.8 13 31 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
16.1% Very poor
Read 41.1
Write 41.5
Mixed 34.3
SusWrite 14.8
24% 32.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
118% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 33%
WD WD25 00JS-58NCB1 250GB
143GB free
Firmware: 10.02E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 16 14 14 17 32 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
21.5% Poor
Read 54.6
Write 52.5
Mixed 39.3
SusWrite 19.6
31% 41.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 21.5%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 6 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
43.2% Average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 14.1
MC Mixed 13.2
42% 14.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 11.3
SC Mixed 12.9
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 63.6
63% 63.6 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P6X58D-E Builds (Compare 1,357 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P6X58D-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $299
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback