TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus KRPA-U16 Series

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive211% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemAsus KRPA-U16 Series  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK KRPA-U16 Series
Memory121.2 GB free of 128 GB @ 3.2 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit, Цвета: 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201116
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 15 '21 at 14:06
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD EPYC 7502P 32-Core
CPU1, 1 CPU, 32 cores, 64 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
68.8% Good
Memory 64.3
1-Core 99.8
2-Core 199
67% 121 Pts
4-Core 392
8-Core 824
71% 608 Pts
64-Core 4,246
263% 4,246 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑
This bench: 68.8%
 Great: 77%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kxd51rue960g TOSHIBA 960GB
845GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1CEE6111
SusWrite @10s intervals: 872 874 872 870 874 876 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
211% Outstanding
Read 1,700
Write 871
Mixed 800
SusWrite 873
236% 1,061 MB/s
4K Read 29.5
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 45.6
161% 61.4 MB/s
DQ Read 996
DQ Write 793
DQ Mixed 481
473% 757 MB/s
Poor: 167% ↑
This bench: 211%
 Great: 303%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A4K40DB3-CWE 4x31.8GB
4 of 16 slots used
127GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
178% Outstanding
MC Read 70.8
MC Write 74.4
MC Mixed 73.7
208% 73 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 22.1
SC Mixed 30.9
67% 23.6 GB/s
Latency 116
35% 116 ns
Poor: 65% ↑
This bench: 178%
 Great: 180%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback