Asus TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics21.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemAsus TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX504GD
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190610
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateJan 15 '21 at 08:13
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU7%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
77.3% Very good
Memory 88.8
1-Core 120
2-Core 224
82% 144 Pts
4-Core 355
8-Core 551
56% 453 Pts
64-Core 546
34% 546 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050 (Mobile)
Asus(1043 10C1) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.6109
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
21.7% Poor
Lighting 26.8
Reflection 37
Parallax 27.2
22% 30.3 fps
MRender 35.2
Gravity 26.8
Splatting 19.3
21% 27.1 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 21.7%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$59
7GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 42B2S7JA Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,134
Write 1,180
Mixed 1,001
247% 1,105 MB/s
4K Read 52.8
4K Write 97.6
4K Mixed 66.6
217% 72.3 MB/s
DQ Read 802
DQ Write 400
DQ Mixed 412
356% 538 MB/s
Poor: 139% Great: 271%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 1TB-$65
104GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 75 75 80 86 86 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
38.2% Below average
Read 54.7
Write 27.5
Mixed 52.3
SusWrite 78.2
40% 53.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1.4
230% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
42% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 14.5
MC Mixed 11.4
40% 14.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 13
SC Mixed 12.1
34% 12.1 GB/s
Latency 68.7
58% 68.7 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 42%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD Builds (Compare 2,639 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback