Asus P9X79

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics95.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P9X79  (all builds)
Memory14.3 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140724
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 14 '21 at 19:11
Run Duration228 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
64.1% Good
Memory 72.5
1-Core 75.4
2-Core 151
58% 99.5 Pts
4-Core 300
8-Core 558
51% 429 Pts
64-Core 1,072
66% 1,072 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.09
Performing below potential (75th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
95.3% Outstanding
Lighting 120
Reflection 128
Parallax 119
98% 122 fps
MRender 95
Gravity 125
Splatting 111
91% 110 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 95.3%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
150GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,490
Write 3378
Mixed 3,374
763% 3,414 MB/s
4K Read 205
4K Write 146
4K Mixed 153
584% 168 MB/s
DQ Read 468
DQ Write 302
DQ Mixed 374
282% 382 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
WDS500G3XHC-00SJG0 500GB
435GB free
Firmware: 102000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1184 837 839 838 837 838 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
192% Outstanding
Read 1,984
Write 1,823
Mixed 1,585
SusWrite 896
352% 1,572 MB/s
4K Read 33.7
4K Write 65.6
4K Mixed 44.7
143% 48 MB/s
DQ Read 360
DQ Write 251
DQ Mixed 334
242% 315 MB/s
Poor: 184%
This bench: 192%
Great: 288%
Hitachi HDS723020BLA642 2TB-$249
636GB free
Firmware: MN6OA800
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 97 94 99 89 98 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
33.6% Below average
Read 20.8
Write 82.7
Mixed 32.5
SusWrite 96.1
42% 58 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.3
78% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 85%
Hitachi HDS723020BLA642 2TB-$249
759GB free
Firmware: MN6OAA10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 104 107 108 106 107 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
59.3% Above average
Read 100
Write 97.8
Mixed 58.2
SusWrite 106
66% 90.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
162% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 85%
Hitachi HDS723020BLA642 2TB-$249
454GB free
Firmware: MN6OA800
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 82 86 86 86 86 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
50% Above average
Read 89.1
Write 90.1
Mixed 45
SusWrite 84.9
56% 77.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
174% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 50%
Great: 85%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
154GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3T0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 77 80 81 81 82 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
48.6% Average
Read 88.9
Write 84.1
Mixed 25.1
SusWrite 80.3
50% 69.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
118% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 6x4GB
6 of 8 slots used
24GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
44.8% Average
MC Read 18.2
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 15.2
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 8.5
27% 9.6 GB/s
Latency 95.8
42% 95.8 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P9X79 Builds (Compare 1,718 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus P9X79 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $654
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback