HP ENVY x360 Convertible 15m-cp0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics10.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive94% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemHP ENVY x360 Convertible 15m-cp0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8497
Memory3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190402
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateJan 14 '21 at 17:12
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
47.4% Average
Memory 47.5
1-Core 115
2-Core 195
64% 119 Pts
4-Core 254
8-Core 536
46% 395 Pts
64-Core 487
30% 487 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Graphics
HP(103C 8497) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 19.10.08.06
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
10.8% Very poor
Lighting 14.2
Reflection 10.9
Parallax 20.4
12% 15.2 fps
MRender 6.1
Gravity 16.4
Splatting 11.1
9% 11.2 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 10.8%
Great: 12%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG-62A0A 256GB
134GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80000E00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 250 224 223 243 235 233 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
94% Outstanding
Read 807
Write 256
Mixed 331
SusWrite 235
89% 407 MB/s
4K Read 20.2
4K Write 88.8
4K Mixed 24.9
110% 44.6 MB/s
DQ Read 437
DQ Write 211
DQ Mixed 268
214% 305 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 94%
Great: 163%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
43.8% Average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 15.6
MC Mixed 13.6
44% 15.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 17
SC Mixed 15.4
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 170
24% 170 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ENVY x360 Convertible 15m-cp0xxx Builds (Compare 67 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP ENVY x360 Convertible 15m-cp0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback