MSI Z390-A PRO (MS-7B98)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B98
MotherboardMSI Z390-A PRO (MS-7B98)  (all builds)
Memory18.4 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190321
Uptime5.1 Days
Run DateJan 14 '21 at 15:03
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 49%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9600K-$145
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
86.3% Excellent
Memory 90.4
1-Core 134
2-Core 244
88% 156 Pts
4-Core 446
8-Core 625
67% 535 Pts
64-Core 751
46% 751 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 86.3%
Great: 103%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
102% Outstanding
Lighting 122
Reflection 112
Parallax 130
100% 121 fps
MRender 173
Gravity 125
Splatting 106
107% 135 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 102%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$59
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SS0328D Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2462
Write 729
Mixed 140
237% 1,110 MB/s
4K Read 60
4K Write 155
4K Mixed 82.5
279% 99.3 MB/s
DQ Read 826
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 136
219% 435 MB/s
Poor: 139% Great: 271%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
136GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 415 459 465 467 464 470 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 484
Write 475
Mixed 400
SusWrite 457
102% 454 MB/s
4K Read 41.6
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 56.7
189% 66.2 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 353
266% 355 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 122%
Great: 134%
Crucial BX500 960GB-$54
187GB free
Firmware: M6CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 252 267 268 39 4.7 4.6 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
79.6% Very good
Read 501
Write 258
Mixed 337
SusWrite 139
68% 309 MB/s
4K Read 32.8
4K Write 95.3
4K Mixed 30.1
139% 52.7 MB/s
DQ Read 205
DQ Write 222
DQ Mixed 45.9
81% 158 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS4G4D240FSB.8FARG 029E CMK16GX4M2A2666C16 859B BLS4G4D240FSB.8FARG 029E CMK16GX4M2A2666C16 24GB
2667, 2667, 2667, 2667 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
81.1% Excellent
MC Read 30.2
MC Write 32.6
MC Mixed 26.9
85% 29.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 24.2
SC Mixed 22.2
55% 19.3 GB/s
Latency 66.7
60% 66.7 ns
Poor: 81%
This bench: 81.1%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z390-A PRO (MS-7B98) Builds (Compare 32,147 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 113%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI Z390-A PRO (MS-7B98) - $241

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $831
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback